Această carte reprezintă un testament profesional al celor mai bine de 30 de ani de carieră. Să lucrez cu studenții mei la inginerie aerospațială, elevi piloți și elevi controlori de trafic aerian, de-a lungul multor generații, a fost provocator în cel mai fericit mod. Dezbaterile, ideile și întrebările din clasă au fost foarte productive în stabilirea conținutului.
Aceasta este o carte tipărită pe hârtie, menită să fie citită într-o lume bazată pe Internet. Unele subiecte sunt prezentate doar ca un declanșator al curiozității, incitând cititorul să caute mai departe online. Această caracteristică permite cărții să fie comprehensivă și în același timp să se încadreze într-un singur volum.
Multe fapte sunt ilustrate cu povestiri potrivite, exemple și studii de caz. Poate fi considerată o carte de povestiri și experiența mea cu studenții a arătat că această abordare aduce audiența mai aproape de subiect și crește implicarea. Oamenii din spatele acestor povestiri sunt de multe ori fascinanți și de aceea multe personalități sunt menționate, aducând emoții care în mod normal nu se regăsesc într-o carte de știință și tehnologie. Totuși, tinerele generații de studenți par atrași de o astfel de abordare.
Studii de caz acompaniază diferite capitole. Rolul lor este de a conecta textul la realitate, oferind exemple din viața reală, ca un instrument de învățare. Aviația este un domeniu inteligent, în sensul că fiecare accident și incident este o oportunitate de a învăța lecții utile. De fapt, dezvoltarea aviației este uneori chiar guvernată de reacția comunității aviatice la astfel de evenimente nedorite. Fiecare sistem al aeronavei și fiecare procedură are o istorie de accidente și de incidente în spatele formei lor, al rolului și al funcționalității lor actuale. Studiile de caz din această carte sunt esențializate într-un format de o singură pagină, în contrast cu sutele de pagini ale rapoartelor de investigare a accidentelor. Evident, este o grea pierdere de semnificații în acest proces reducționist. Cititorii sunt încurajați să caute detaliile pe Internet, unde majoritatea rapoartelor oficiale ale accidentelor pot fi găsite.
Exemplele numerice denumite Numerical Close-Ups sunt esențiale acestei cărți. În cei peste 30 de ani de experiență ca profesor, deseori am avut iluzia că am înțeles clar o chestiune tehnică citind teoria, ca de fapt totul să se prăbușească când încercam primul exemplu numeric. În cele din urmă, după ce reușeam să fac exemplul să funcționeze, realizam că înțelegerea mea inițială fusese superficială. Această carte nu încearcă să explice lucruri pentru care autorul nu e capabil să producă o implementare numerică. Această caracteristică se adresează segmentului de cititori care sunt atrași de latura practică a lucrurilor, dar și de calcul. Metodele numerice prezentate pot fi ușor incluse în software scris de cititori, deoarece ele sunt opusul stilului Matlab de cutie neagră. Exemplele numerice reflectă dincolo de orice altceva, natura aceastei cărți orientate către rezolvarea problemelor.
Multă din complexitatea navigației aeriene este ilustrată în această carte cu grafice create de autor. Am făcut asta încă din 1995, de la publicarea primei mele cărți într-o editură tehnică prestigioasă (Editura Militară din București). Încă de atunci observam că diviziunea muncii între autorii de text și ilustratorii profesioniști este adesea contraproductivă. Multe desene și diagrame pe care le văd în literatură ratează chestiuni esențiale din text, dacă nu chiar mai rău (concepții greșite și erori), dar sper că aici am reușit să evit această fractură.
Cartea este originală și originalitatea este intenționată. Decizia ce să includ și ce să exclud din carte a pornit de la idei proaspete, sper originale (surprinzător, multe idei pe care le credeam originale le-am găsit până la urmă și altundeva, dar am luat asta ca pe o confirmare binevenită). Originalitatea în ingineria aerospațială este însă un pariu dificil.
Cartea este utilă studenților și inginerilor aerospațiali, dar și piloților și controlorilor de trafic curioși, care vor să-și structureze mai bine în minte cunoștințele și să înțeleagă mai bine de ce sistemele din aviație sunt atât de complexe și cum funcționează. De asemenea, cartea îi ajută pe cercetătorii din computer science și din științele conexe, care doresc să abordeze un subiect de aviație.
La această dată cartea este finalizată 85%. Capitolele 10 și 11 sunt încă în lucru și Capitolele 9 și 12, deși sunt avansate, nu sunt complet terminate. Șantierul acestei cărți a debutat în 1992, dar abia din iunie 2020 m-am putut dedica într-adevăr proiectului. Microsoft Word îmi comunică 54.692 de minute de editare, dar asta doar pentru text. Corel Draw nu are un contor de minute. Sper că sunt minute bine trăite. Până când o voi termina în 2022, sper să găsesc o modalitate bună de a o publica și de a o oferi acelei audiențe care ar agreea-o și care ar găsi-o utilă.
Octavian Thor Pleter
București, 10 ianuarie 2022
Chapters
Ch. | Chapter Title | Pages |
0 | Intro | 6 |
1 | Navigation Jargon | 6 |
2 | Geodesy | 48 |
3 | Atmosphere | 84 |
4 | Directions, Azimuths, Horizon | 80 |
5 | Time | 48 |
6 | Vertical and Horizontal Navigation | 46 |
7 | Aircraft | 80 |
8 | Radio Navigation | 144 |
9 | Trajectory | 56 |
10 | Air Traffic Management | 48 |
11 | Flight Planning and Management | 32 |
12 | Navigation Optimisations | 48 |
13 | References | 8 |
14 | Index | 24 |
Total | 758 |
List of Case Studies
Ch. | Case | Key facts | Page |
2 | A333, THY 726, Kathmandu, Nepal, 4/03/15 | truncating errors in coordinates, landing below minima | 60 |
3 | An-148, Reception flight, Voronezh, 5/03/11 | accelerating at 30 kts over VNE due to gross ASI errors | 126 |
3 | A332, AFR 447, Tasil Point, Atlantic Ocean, 1/06/09 | dissimilarity principle disregarded, Pitot icing, flying pilot fails to control manually in direct law | 130 |
3 | B757, PLI 603, Lima, 2/10/96 | static vents blocked | 131 |
3 | Boeing 737 MAX, LNI 610, Java Sea, 29/10/18 | AOA sensor failure, single point of failure design error, pilots not made aware of the MCAS system | 141 |
3 | Boeing 737 MAX, ETH 302, Bishoftu, Ethiopia, 10/03/19 | AOA sensor failure, single point of failure design error, wrong technical note on the MCAS de-activation | 142 |
3 | A320, test flight, Perpignan, France, 27/11/08 | AOA sensors frozen due to washing the aircraft with water under pressure | 143 |
3 | A321, LHA 1829, Bilbao, Spain, 5/11/14 | AOA sensors blocked, 2 out of 3 logic beaten by circuit breaker | 144 |
4 | B752, AAL 965, Cali, Columbia, 20/12/95 | CFIT by NDB identifier confusion and inadvertent turn | 224 |
5 | IS-28M2 formation flight to Australia | record breaking motor gliders flight | 272 |
6 | A320, Air Inter 148, Mt. St. Odile, 20/01/92 | confusion between FPA and VS autopilot descend functions | 288 |
7 | A310, RO 381, Paris Orly, 24/09/94 | speed envelope protection not understood by pilots, who attempted to accelerate aircraft beyond VFE | 351 |
7 | A310, RO 371, Balotești, Romania, 31/03/95 | ATHR software bug not corrected, pilot incapacitated, pilot flying not aware of the attitude and engines, not aware of the technical note on the ATHR problem | 356 |
7 | B772, AAR 214, San Francisco, CA, 6/07/13 | poor airmanship in manual approach, wrong autopilot mode selection for the final approach (FLCH), pilots failed to monitor airspeed, special cockpit conditions | 359 |
7 | A320, AWQ 8501, Java Sea, 28/12/14 | pilot resets AFCSs and fail to control manually in direct law | 371 |
7 | A320, LH 2904, Warsaw, 14/09/93 | bad wind report by the Tower, all braking systems disabled by software under half touchdown circumstances | 372 |
7 | B773, UAE 521, Dubai, 3/08/16 | pilots not aware that automated go around cannot be engaged after touchdown resulted in overrun | 373 |
7 | A388, QFA 32, Singapore, 4/11/2010 | uncontained engine failure, multiple failures, resilient response from the crew | 380 |
7 | MD-82, Spanair 5022, Madrid Barajas, 20/8/2008 | wrong take-off configuration (zero flaps) not warned due to improper maintenance | 383 |
8 | B732, Varig 254, Amazonian Jungle, Brazil, 3/09/89 | bad navigation, change of flight plan format, NDB confusion | 443 |
8 | B738, THY 1951, Schipol, the Netherlands, 25/2/09 | single RA in APP mode fails, throttle retards, pilots fail to monitor airspeed, special cockpit condition | 489 |
8 | A343, AF 3093, Paris, CDG, 13/03/12 | false glideslope interception, obsolence of the ILS-GP system as per new ways to navigate (CDA) | 526 |
10 | XPDR incidents | latent condition of future midair collisions due to obsolence of FWS ranking XPDR as non-essential avionics | |
10 | B752 and T154 midair collision, Uberlingen, 1/07/02 | midair collision due to the problems of principle with integrating TCAS in ATM | |
10 | CL60 and A388, Arabian Sea, 7/01/17 | enroute wake turbulence accident | |
11 | DC10, TE 901, Mount Erebus, 28/11/79 | pilots not aware of changed flight plan | |
11 | RJ85, LaMia 2933, Mt. Cerro Gordo, Columbia, 28/11/16 | wrong flight planning resulting in fuel starvation | |
11 | A310, Hapag Lloyd 3378, Vienna, Schwechat, 12/07/00 | wrong assumption by the pilots that FMS does accurate fuel management calculations resulting in fuel starvation | |
12 | B742, KAL 007, Sakhalin Island, 1/09/83 | gross navigation error resulting in flying in a prohibited area | |
12 | B772, MH370, Indian Ocean, 8/03/14 | hijacking | |
12 | B772, BAW 38, London, Heathrow, 17/01/08 | obsolence of engine design as per new ways to navigate (CDA) |
List of Case Examples
Ch. | Case | Key facts | Page |
2 | Douglas Aircraft World Cruiser 1924 from Santa Monica, California Frederick L. Martin and others | first circumnavigation flight | 18 |
2 | Concorde AF1995 Air France 1995 around the globe from JFK airport in New York, USA and | fastest circumnavigation with passengers in 31.5 hrs | 19 |
3 | A320, Atlasglobal Ukraine KK-1010 near Istanbul on 27/07/2017 | hail | 103 |
3 | BAC 111 One Eleven test flight | deep stall due to the T-tail | 139 |
7 | BA3271 landed at Edinburgh instead of Dusseldorf | flight plan mistake | 342 |
7 | AirAsia from Sidney to Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, landed in Melbourne | flight plan mistake | 342 |
7 | Helios Airways 522 at Grammatiko, Greece on 14/08/05 | pilots incapacitated by hypoxia | 344 |
7 | A320, LHA 044, Hamburg, 1/03/08 | insufficient amplitude of lateral movement of the sidestick after half touchdown, pilots not made aware of the gain adaptation feature | 364 |
7 | B738, ETH 409, Beirut, 25/01/10 | A/P failed to engage due to interlock, CRM failure, loss of situational awareness | 365 |
7 | Trident BEA and DC9 Inex Adria midair collision, Zagreb, 10/09/76 | Wrong climb clearance in Serbo-Croatian, chronic overload of ATCOs, many precursor incidents | 389 |
7 | E170 LOT 7293 and Dassault Falcon 900 airprox, Varna, 30/06/15 | Near collision due to transponder failure not processed by ATC | 395 |
8 | US Air Force CT-43A near Dubrovnik 1996 | flying NDB instrument approach with single ADF | 447 |
8 | GPS jamming New Jersey | ||
12 | Formation flying |
List of Personalities
Ch. | Personality (order of appearance in the book) | Page |
2 | Friedrich Robert Helmert – founder of modern geodesy | 13 |
2 | Pythagoras | 13 |
2 | Erathostenes of Cyrene | 13 |
2 | Cristofor Columbus | 15 |
2 | Ferdinand Magellan | 16 |
2 | Piri Reis | 17 |
2 | Francis Joyon – fastest circumnavigation by boat | 18 |
2 | Frederick L. Martin – first circumnavigation in flight | 18 |
2 | Alva L. Harvey – first circumnavigation in flight | 18 |
2 | Lowell H. Smith – first circumnavigation in flight | 18 |
2 | Leslie P. Arnold – first circumnavigation in flight | 18 |
2 | Leigh P. Wade – first circumnavigation in flight | 18 |
2 | Henry H. Ogden – first circumnavigation in flight | 18 |
2 | Erik H. Nelson – first circumnavigation in flight | 18 |
2 | John Harding Jr – first circumnavigation in flight | 18 |
2 | Humphrey, Duke of Gloucester – founder of Royal Observatory of Greenwich (England) | 33 |
2 | Pierre Louis Maupertuis – introduced rotation ellipsoids as Earth approximators | 38 |
3 | Alexandr Fedotov – flight at the record height | 78 |
3 | Phillip Dalton – inventor of flight computer | 90 |
3 | Sadi Carnot | 104 |
3 | Henri Pitot | 109 |
4 | John Bird – co-inventor of sextant | 152 |
4 | Capt. John Campbell – co-inventor of sextant | 152 |
4 | John Hadley – inventor of octant | 153 |
4 | Cornelius Douwes – first mathematician to formulate the astronomical positioning problem | 156 |
4 | Capt. Thomas Hubbard Sumner – inventor of astronomical positioning method | 157 |
4 | Marcq de Saint Hilaire– inventor of astronomical positioning method | 158 |
4 | Archibald Smith – inventor of compass deviation compensation method | 181 |
4 | Leonhard Euler | 192 |
4 | Peter Guthrie Tait – co-author of a formalisation of the Euler angles adapted to aviation | 192 |
4 | George H. Bryan – co-author of a formalisation of the Euler angles adapted to aviation | 192 |
4 | William Hamilton – inventor of quaternions | 194 |
4 | Jurgis Kairys – aeronautical engineer and aerobatic pilot | 213 |
5 | Jerrold Zacharias 1953 – first atomic clock | 227 |
5 | Julius Caesar | 230 |
5 | Pope Gregorius the XIII-th | 230 |
5 | Johannes Kepler | 233 |
5 | Iosif Silimon – aeronautical engineer | 251 |
5 | Gemma Frisius – discovered longitude-time dependency | 258 |
5 | Philipp Eckerbrecht – cartographer | 258 |
5 | Galileo Galilei | 258 |
5 | Christiaan Huygens – inventor of pendulum clock | 258 |
5 | John Harrison – inventor of navigation chronograph | 258 |
6 | Viktor Georgiyevich Pugachyov – pilot, inventor of Cobra manoeuvre | 280 |
6 | Sir Isaac Newton | 306 |
6 | Charles Stark Draper – inventor of Inertial Navigation System | 309 |
7 | Orville Wright – co-inventor of the controlled airplane | 320 |
7 | Wilbur Wright – co-inventor of the controlled airplane | 320 |
7 | Robert Esnault-Pelterie – inventor of flying stick | 320 |
7 | Montgolfier brothers – inventors of hot air balloon | 321 |
7 | Jean-François Pilâtre de Rozier – first balloon flight | 321 |
7 | François Laurent d’Arlandes – first balloon flight | 321 |
7 | Count Ferdinand von Zeppelin – inventor of dirigible | 321 |
8 | James Clerk Maxwell | 399 |
8 | Heinrich Herz | 403 |
8 | Nikola Tesla – co-inventor of radio technology | 405 |
8 | Guglielmo Marconi – co-inventor of radio technology | 405 |
8 | Edwin Howard Armstrong – inventor of superheterodyne | 434 |
8 | Robert Hanbury Brown – co-inventor of Radar, inventor of the Rebeka-Eureka precursor of DME | 464 |
9 | Gerardus Mercator | |
9 | Johann Bernoulli | |
9 | Elrey B. Jeppesen | |
10 | Ernst Mach | |
12 | Rudolf Kalman |
List of Photos
Ch. | Photo | Keywords | Page |
1 | Mircea barque, the traditional training ship for the Romanian Navy | sea, maritime navigation | 8 |
1 | Open sea | sea | 9 |
1 | Nasa: Earth picture from the Moon orbit, Apollo 11 | Earth, Apollo | 12 |
2 | Friedrich Robert Helmert | Helmert | 13 |
2 | Erathostenes of Cyrene | Erathostenes | 13 |
2 | Cristofor Columbus | Columbus | 15 |
2 | Viajes_de_colon | Columbus voyages | 15 |
2 | Ferdinand Magellan | Magellan | 16 |
2 | Magellan_Elcano_Circumnavigation-fr | Magellan voyage | 16 |
2 | Piri Reis map of South America | Piri Reis | 17 |
2 | Francis Joyon – IDEC SPORT trimaran | Joyon | 18 |
2 | Frederick L. Martin | Martin | 18 |
2 | Douglas Aircraft World Cruiser | Douglas | 19 |
2 | Concorde Air France | Concorde, Air France | 20 |
2 | water drop | 21 | |
2 | paperclip and insect | superficial tension | 21 |
2 | sphere | 21 | |
2 | tetraedron | 22 | |
2 | raindrop | 22 | |
2 | Earth from space: Celestis memorial spaceflights | Earth | 25 |
2 | Earth’s Geoid as seen by GOCE | Earth, geoid | 28 |
2 | ECEF frame | ECEF | 30 |
2 | Humphrey, Duke of Gloucester | Humphrey | 33 |
2 | Royal Observatory of Greenwich | Greenwich | 33 |
2 | Prime Meridian set in stone | Greenwich, Prime Meridian | 33 |
2 | plumb bob | plumb bob | 55 |
2 | NGA, Earth’s EGM2008 Geoid | Earth, geoid | 55 |
3 | barometer | barometer | 61 |
3 | cruise head to head encounter | cruise | 81 |
3 | Aristo Aviat flight calculator | flight calculator | 89 |
3 | de-icing a Boeing 777 in snowfall | de-icing | 104 |
3 | B-52 | B-52 | 105 |
3 | Henri Pitot | Pitot | 109 |
3 | B737 EFIS | EFIS | 118 |
3 | machmeter | machmeter | 123 |
3 | slideslip angle on PFD | sideslip | 140 |
4 | cardinal and ordinal points | cardinal points | 145 |
4 | wind rose | wind rose | 145 |
4 | azimuth dial | azimuth dial | 146 |
4 | long exposure night sky quiz | night sky | 148 |
4 | sextant on board Boeing KC-135A | sextant KC-135 | 156 |
4 | Ilyushin Il-14 with astonomic observation cupole | Il-14 | 159 |
4 | Chinese South Pointer (200 AD) spoon-like | magnetic compass | 168 |
4 | Typical maritime magnetic compass (horizontal) | magnetic compass | 169 |
4 | aviation magnetic compass | magnetic compass | 169 |
4 | wander of Magnetic North pole | Magnetic North | 171 |
4 | TN, MN, and ARC | MN VAR chart symbols | 173 |
4 | ARC example | MN VAR ARC | 174 |
4 | Runway marks RWY 33L | runway | 176 |
4 | Jeppesen low level radio navigation chart | aeronautical chart | 176 |
4 | compass deviation diagram | compass deviation | 183 |
4 | gyroscope and its spin axis | gyroscope | 189 |
4 | Jurgis Kairys sideslip flying | sideslip flying | 213 |
4 | turn from B737 cockpit photo by Patrick Lutz, a Top 100 www.airliners.net | cockpit | 218 |
4 | Turn Coordinator | TCI | 219 |
4 | HDG select and bank limit knob on MCP B737 | bank limit | 220 |
4 | 60° bank turn from Dassault Falcon-2000 cockpit by Fabrice Sanchez, www.airliners.net | 60° bank turn | 222 |
5 | Giza pyramids, Cairo, Egypt | pyramid complex | 225 |
5 | astronomical clock, Prague, Czechia | astronomical clock | 225 |
5 | Stonhenge, Gr. Britain | stone calendar | 225 |
5 | apparent movement of the Sun in the sky from sunrise to sunset | Sun movement | 226 |
5 | egg | egg | 227 |
5 | liquid outer core of the Earth in cross section | Earth cross section | 227 |
5 | first atomic clock based on Caesium (Jerrold Zacharias 1953) | atomic clock | 227 |
5 | modern atomic clock based on Rubidium installed at BNM-LPTF, Paris | atomic clock | 227 |
5 | IERS measurements of the Earth spin with atomic clocks between 1960 and 2020 | Earth spin diagram | 229 |
5 | Julius Caesar | Julius Caesar | 230 |
5 | Pope Gregorius the XIII-th | Pope Gregorius the XIII-th | 230 |
5 | twilight Dumitru Oprisiu | twilight | 237 |
5 | EOT display, the clock of Piazza Dante, Naples | EOT | 243 |
5 | navigation lights of an airplane | navigation lights | 249 |
5 | Blériot-Spad 46 airplane of the French-Romanian Navigation Company over Constantinople | FRNA | 250 |
5 | Iosif Silimon at ICA Ghimbav | Silimon | 251 |
5 | IS-28M2 and Airbus A300 at Paris Air Show 1975 | IS-28M2, A300 | 251 |
5 | IS-28M2 prototype flying over Sibiu | IS-28M2 | 252 |
5 | John Harrison | Harrison | 259 |
5 | 24 Time Zones and the Civil Times worldwide | time zones | 260 |
5 | Solar Time compared to the Standard (Local) Time | solar time, local time | 261 |
5 | Daylight Saving Time (DST) | DST | 262 |
5 | Date Change Line opposed to the Prime Meridian | 264 | |
5 | Salvador Dali | 270 | |
6 | Viktor Georgiyevich Pugachyov | Pugachyov | 280 |
6 | Air Inter 148 approach trajectory | 289 | |
6 | Air Inter 148 vertical and horizontal wind triangles | 290 | |
6 | Wind triangle | 292 | |
6 | Flight computer CX-2 | 295 | |
6 | Flight computer Aristo Aviat | 296 | |
6 | holding pattern displacement by wind | hold | 304 |
6 | Sir Isaac Newton | Newton | 306 |
6 | Charles Stark Draper | Draper | 309 |
6 | Excel formula for integration | inertial navigation | 316 |
6 | Diagram of acceleration and integrated speed | inertial navigation | 316 |
6 | Diagram of acceleration, integrated speed, and double integrated distance | inertial navigation | 317 |
7 | Orville and Wilbur Wright | 320 | |
7 | The Wright Flyer | 320 | |
7 | USS Macon flies above New York in 1933 | 323 | |
7 | ROMBAC One-Eleven | 325 | |
7 | Airbus sidestick | 363 | |
7 | Boeing column and steering wheel | 363 | |
7 | LHA 044 A320 incident at Hamburg RWY 23 | 364 | |
7 | A/P instinctive Cut-Out button | 365 | |
7 | Boeing 737-700 FMS CDU snapshot from PMDG Flight Sim | FMS CDU | 376 |
8 | James Clerk Maxwell | 399 | |
8 | Wave/Electromagnetic theory vs. Corpuscular/Quantum theory | 403 | |
8 | electromagnetic propagation phenomena | 404 | |
8 | Nikola Tesla | 405 | |
8 | Guglielmo Marconi | 405 | |
8 | radio communications | 405 | |
8 | radio communications broadcast | 406 | |
8 | radio location | 407 | |
8 | passive radio location | 408 | |
8 | primary radio location | 408 | |
8 | secondary radio location | 410 | |
8 | directivity diagram of a stick antenna | 423 | |
8 | directivity diagram of a rectangle antenna | 424 | |
8 | rectangle antenna with more loops to multiply sensitivity | 424 | |
8 | cardioid | 425 | |
8 | horizontal and vertical directivity diagrams of a highly directive antenna | 425 | |
8 | primary radar antenna with a parabolic reflector | 426 | |
8 | parabolic reflector cross section | 426 | |
8 | demodulator | 431 | |
8 | Edwin Howard Armstrong | 434 | |
8 | superheterodyne block diagram | 435 | |
8 | landscape for visual navigation in daylight | 442 | |
8 | night time landscape with fires to mark the flight route | 442 | |
8 | radio beacons replacing fires | 442 | |
8 | ADF-NDB system | 442 | |
8 | ADF on ND Map Mode | 445 | |
8 | ADF on ND VOR Mode | 445 | |
8 | VDF antenna | 448 | |
8 | VDF unit | 448 | |
8 | VDF control panel | 449 | |
8 | VOR radial | 458 | |
8 | DME transponder Moog | 473 | |
8 | DME transponder ground antenna | 475 | |
8 | DME locator Collins | 476 | |
8 | Radar altimeter measurement principle | 477 | |
8 | Radar altimeter errors | 481 | |
8 | Boeing 737-700 flight plan KDTW-KORD first part | 504 | |
8 | Boeing 737-700 flight plan KDTW-KORD second part | 504 | |
8 | Boeing 737-700 – cockpit front panel, ND on Map Mode | 505 | |
8 | Boeing 737-700 – cockpit front panel ND on VOR Mode | 505 | |
8 | Boeing 737-700 on the final – cockpit front panel | 506 | |
8 | FMS POS REF | 508 | |
8 | Boeing 747-400 on short final | 515 | |
9 | LROP-LRTR direct route on map | ||
9 | LROP-LRTR direct route diagram | ||
9 | Gerardus Mercator | ||
9 | LROP-LRTR loxodrome diagram | ||
9 | YSSY-KORD orthodrome on map | ||
9 | YSSY-KORD orthodrome diagram | ||
9 | LROP-PAFA loxodrome diagram | ||
9 | Typical wind rotor | ||
9 | 2D Brachistochrone results | ||
9 | 2D Brachistochrone genetic algorithm convergence diagram | ||
9 | 3D Brachistochrone results | ||
9 | 3D Brachistochrone genetic algorithm convergence diagram | ||
12 | Rudolf Kalman | ||
12 | Diagram of Kalman filter positioning results | ||
12 | Diagram of Kalman filter velocity results |
List of Figures
Figure | Legend | Page |
2.1 | Erathostenes of Cyrene calculated the circumference of the globe around 200 BC with an outstanding accuracy (4%) | 14 |
2.2 | The Earth represented as a sphere, in its Eastward rotation with the angular speed W | 23 |
2.3 | The Earth represented as an oblate rotation ellipsoid, as flattened by the unevenly distributed application of the centrifugal force generated by its spin around the polar axis | 24 |
2.4 | The meridian circle of the Earth is an ellipse, almost all celestial bodies and their trajectories
in the universe are ellipses |
26 |
2.5 | The major semiaxis a and the minor semiaxis b of an ellipse; c is the distance of the focal points F1 and F2 from the centre O; the ellipse is the locus of the points Q for which F1Q+F2Q=constant | 27 |
2.6 | A meridian cross-section of the geoid (blue) and the rotation ellipsoid (magenta); the geoid is exaggerated in this drawing to improve visibility; in reality the differences are less than 0.0015% in elevation (undulation), and less than 30″ of arc in deflection of the vertical | 29 |
2.7 | Earth Centered Earth Fixed (ECEF) frame in green versus Geodetical Spherical Coordinates (GSC) in red, the most frequently used frames in air navigation | 34 |
2.8 | The four approximations of the shape of the Earth with their model equation, timeline, and accuracy | 38 |
2.9 | The apparent weight as the sum of the two vectors: mass attraction and centrifugal force, the three verticals, the three latitudes and the acceleration of gravity along the astronomic vertical | 44 |
2.10 | For an aircraft A located at a position P on the surface of the Earth, flying at an altitude H, the latter forms a red triangle with R the local radius of the Earth, and r, the distance to the centre of the Earth O | 45 |
2.11 | Variation of the acceleration of gravity with altitude (above) and with latitude (below)
|
50 |
2.12 | Defining the three verticals in geodesy, and the three surfaces these verticals are normal to | 56 |
2.13 | Undulation of three geoid models in a 140×140 NM area centred at Bucharest Aurel Vlaicu International Airport (LRBS) at 10×10 NM interpolated grid resolution | 59 |
3.1 | Elementary airplane flight dynamics: for the equilibrium flight, the lift must equal the weight, and the thrust must equal the drag; the unbalance between the lift and weight makes the aircraft to climb or descend, and the unbalance between the thrust and drag makes the aircraft to accelerate or decelerate | 63 |
3.2 | The differential hydrostatic equation is the expression of the balance of vertical forces acting on an infinitely small segment of a cylinder in the atmosphere | 66 |
3.3 | Earth’s atmosphere segmentation into thermal layers, each with own temperature gradient tk (the temperature values are multiannual averages, if the sea level (H=0) temperature is different from +15°C, the gradients apply from that starting point upwards, and the red polygonal line shifts horizontally) [*88] | 73 |
3.4 | International Standard Atmosphere (ISA) is an essential standard, the result of many years of measurements; it specifies how temperature, pressure, and density change with altitude or height above the mean sea level (MSL) | 75 |
3.5 | Classic altimeter with two needles and a cursor, or three needles (left); the long needle indicates hundreds of feet, the short needle thousands of feet, and the cursor, tens of thousands; the servoaltimeter (right) is more accurate, and combines the digital display with the analogical indication of hundreds of feet | 82 |
3.6 | Depending on the reference setting of the „BARO” knob, the altimeter displays: a) flight level (FL), with respect to the standard ISA pressure p0 = 1013.25 mbar, 101,325 Pa, 29.921 inHg, or 760 mmHg; b) height above runway threshold, with respect to the pressure measured by the meteorological station at the airport pQFE; c) altitude, with respect to the calculated pressure pQNH, at the runway threshold, at the sea level | 84 |
3.7 | Barometric and geometric vertical distances in vertical air navigation | 86 |
3.8 | Barometric and geometric vertical distances (levels, altitudes, and heights) in Numerical example 3.4 | 90 |
3.9 | Pressure and temperature fluctuations in the real atmosphere cause isobaric surfaces climb or descend | 91 |
3.10 | Defining the fourth vertical in vertical navigation; an aircraft flies along an isobaric surface pS | 93 |
3.11 | Effect on hail on an Airbus A320: Atlasglobal Ukraine incident on 27 July 2017 in Istanbul | 103 |
3.12 | The basic six instruments in a Romanian made aircraft of the 1930s: airspeed indicator, gyro-horizon as direction indicator, altimeter (top row), turn and slip indicator, and vertical speed indicator (bottom row); historic pictures belong to the Flight instrument Manual of Mr. Lintes [Lin] | 106 |
3.13 | Basic six classic flying indicators and their functioning principle (Cessna 172) | 107 |
3.14 | Four Pitot tubes are visible on the sides of the nose of this Boeing 747-400 airplane; they need access to a laminar airflow, without interference from other parts of the airplane; the nose is taken by the weather radar, so the next best position is on the sides of the nose, at a significant distance from the fuselage | 109 |
3.15 | Longitudinal section through the Pitot-static tube; the frontal hole is hit by the air coming with the airspeed V aka IAS; the lateral holes capture the static pressure (zero airspeed); the difference in pressure between the two channels is the dynamic pressure, from which we can calculate the indicated airspeed IAS | 110 |
3.16 | Typical Baro instruments layout for a classic general aviation airplane, with Pitot-static probe, which captures pt and ps | 111 |
3.17 | Airspeed Indicator ASI is a differential barometric instrument, the difference between pt and ps dilating the capsules and consequently moving the needle | 112 |
3.18 | Airspeed Indicator ASI scale; the normal airspeed envelope is marked green; the yellow arc is acceptable when the atmosphere is not turbulent; the gray arc is for flying with flaps | 113 |
3.19 | Evolution of IAS, CAS, EAS, and TAS with the pressure altitude H
|
115 |
3.20 | Typical Baro instruments layout for fast classic airliners, with static vents; Mach number is important, so a Machmeter is included; Servo Altimeter and IVSI deliver better accuracy | 121 |
3.21 | Climbs and descents in three types of vertical thermal layers, with negative, zero and positive vertical temperature gradient | 127 |
3.22 | PUDSOD mnemonic helps the pilots to remember the anomalies caused by the blockages of the Pitot tubes and the static vents to ASI, most frequently due to ice; structural damages can also cause the opposite: leaks | 128 |
3.23 | Adiabatic heating and friction increase the temperature of the air sample in the TAT probe and the total air temperature is measured; the Outside Air Temperature is in fact the static air temperature SAT and it is calculated | 133 |
3.24 | Typical Baro instruments layout for a modern airliner with Air Data Computer (ADC) or Air Data Reference System (ADRS) and Electronic Flight Instrument System (EFIS) | 134 |
3.25 | Air Data Computer (ADC) or Air Data Reference (ADR) logic diagram; inputs are total pressure from Pitot tubes, static pressure from static vents, and total air temperature (TAT), which is used to calculate the outside air temperature (OAT) or T; outputs are pressure altitude on altimeter, vertical speed on VSI, Mach on machmeter, IAS on the ASI, and TAS on the Navigation Display | 135 |
3.26 | Typical functional redundancy in a modern airliner (Airbus A330) with three Air Data Reference Systems (ADRS) and Electronic Flight Instrument System (EFIS) to display the baro flight parameters; an additional standby baro instruments set is also fitted | 136 |
3.27 | The sensors of the aerodynamic instruments of Airbus A350 | 137 |
3.28 | The orientation of the airspeed vector V is given by the two aerodynamic angles: AOA and sideslip | 138 |
3.29 | Stall Warning System uses Angle of Attack sensors and flaps position setting to trigger a warning
when a approaches aCRIT |
139 |
4.1 | The heading of an aircraft is measured clockwise from North; there are three references for it: true, magnetic, and compass (in case the compass is a classic one with explicit correction card) | 147 |
4.2 | The North Star’s proximity to the rotation axis of the Earth | 151 |
4.3 | The night sky in the Northern hemisphere | 152 |
4.4 | Sextant from 1766 made by Jesse Ramsden [Joh] | 153 |
4.5 | Finding the astronomic latitude with a sextant (the dumb way) | 154 |
4.6 | The elements of astronomical positioning | 155 |
4.7 | Influence of the height on the horizon; the horizon is the locus of the points where tangents from the point of view touch the Earth; its shape is a circle in case of the spherical Earth approximation | 160 |
4.8 | Coverage problem of targets flying at height HT by a locator flying at a height HL | 164 |
4.9 | Magnetic field of the Earth with its deflected axis and equator and inverted names of the poles | 166 |
4.10 | Magnetic field of the Earth generation and its horizontal and vertical components H and Z | 167 |
4.11 | Magnetic isogonal chart of the world (NOAA/NCEI and CIRES) | 170 |
4.12 | Direct Indicating Compass (DIC) | 178 |
4.13 | Hard and soft iron magnetic field components on the three axes to determine the magnetic
compass deviation d |
180 |
4.14 | The flux valve is a transformer with a primary, the excitation coil, and three secondary coils distributed in a regular pattern; it is kept horizontal; the Earth magnetic
field has a differential effect in each of the three pick-up coils; a given set of voltages Ux corresponds to a unique orientation of the flux valve with respect to the magnetic field |
185 |
4.15 | A classic Remote Indicating Magnetic Compass (RIMC) using selsyns to transmit the angular movement of the Mangnetic North reference as measured by the flux valve to the compass vertical card | 186 |
4.16 | The key azimuths used in air navigation: headings, courses, gisments, and relevments | 188 |
4.17 | Precession of a horizontal gyroscope: apply a vertical force to get a horizontal movement; apply a horizontal force to get a vertical movement | 190 |
4.18 | Aircraft attitude angles are Euler angles in the Tait-Bryan formalization: y is the yaw angle and also the heading of the aircraft measured in a horizontal plane; q is the pitch angle measured in a vertical plane, and j is the bank angle around the longitudinal axis; the angles are measured counter clockwise | 191 |
4.19 | RLG Laser Gyro use a source of light which emits two beam rays going in opposite directions but arriving at the same photocell sensors, being guided in a triangular path by mirrors; one beam goes clockwise and the other goes the same distance counter-clockwise; on arrival, interference between the two beams forms a fringe pattern; if the body of the gyro rotates one way, the same way beam must cover a longer distance and arrives a bit later, whereas the beam going opposite finds its target sooner; the difference can be measured by the width of the interference strips | 198 |
4.20 | Gyroscope with two degrees of freedom; the inner rotor spins around the spin axis with W; the
two articulated gimbals allow the inner rotor to maintain its spin axis, regardless of the angular movements of the airframe (in blue), providing pitch and bank references |
201 |
4.21 | Topple is a vertical change of rigidity axis, and drift is a horizontal change; vertical gyroscopes can only topple, but the horizontal ones can have both type of wander | 202 |
4.22 | Apparent wander (drift and topple) due to Earth rotation | 203 |
4.23 | Artificial Horizon Indicator (AHI) or Attitude Indicator (AI) driven by a pneumatic gyro; indications are (from left to right) q=j=0; q=–30°; q=+30°; j=30° Left | 205 |
4.24 | Artificial horizon indicator (AHI), with its blue and brown representation of the outside world, was combined with the flight director indicator (FDI, the cross needles which show the autopilot current intentions for the stick movement); the hybridization result was called attitude director indicator (ADI); later, it was completed with the airspeed indicator, the altimeter and the vertical speed indicator, to give the current primary flight display (PFD) | 206 |
4.25 | Primary Flight Display (PFD) and the meaning of the elements in the display; the significance of colours is as follows: white = useful information, magenta = desired or target setting, green = selected setting, red = danger, yellow = alert (except the arrows), blue = sky, brown = ground (Boeing 737-700) | 207 |
4.26 | This snapshot from a Cessna C172 illustrates the two main sources of heading information in flight: the magnetic compass (DIC) and the heading indicator (HI) or gyro direction indicator (GDI); HI has a cursor to set the desired heading and also a calibration knob to align with compass when drifting | 207 |
4.27 | Gyro Direction Indicator (gyrocompass) with slaving loop using reference of Magnetic North from the flux valve | 208 |
4.28 | The heading indicator (HI) and the gisment indicator (GI) evolved into the radio-magnetic indicator (RMI), the most popular classic navigation indicator; both HI and RMI use a rotating dial, and the heading is read at the top, on a fixed cursor; the aircraft symbol is used when the reference of the indicator is the longitudinal axis of the aircraft, otherwise the reference is North | 209 |
4.29 | Side by side comparisson between the horizontal navigation situation of an aircraft and the radio-magnetic indicator (RMI) indications; VOR and NDB are radio beacons and the magenta line is the desired route inbound the VOR | 210 |
4.30 | The course deviation indicator (CDI) is a qualitative navigation instrument displaying the course
deviation (CD) angle; if the horizontal navigation is right, CD=0 and the needle is centred; if there is a deviation off course, the needle shows the correct trajectory and the central dot is a symbol of the aircraft trajectory; in Case 2, pilots need to take corrective action, starting with a left turn, fly straight for a while, and when the needle approaches the centre, turn back right |
210 |
4.31 | The Horizontal Situation Indicator (HSI) represents a fusion between the classic RMI and the CDI; in the electro-mechanical integration stage of aviation instruments integration (up to the 1980s), it was the state of the art of navigation flight instruments; even now it can be reproduced electronically on the Electronic Flight Instrument Systems (EFIS) navigation panel; HSI integrates all features of predecessors | 211 |
4.32 | The Navigation Display (ND) is the navigation panel of the Electronic Flight Instrument Systems (EFIS), its format mode is selectable from map mode (left), plan mode (right) [*B8], VOR mode (a HSI display); in the map mode the aircraft position is symbolised by the tip of a white triangle, and the vertical of the display is the longitudinal axis; in the plan mode, the aircraft has a silouhette, and the vertical in True North | 212 |
4.33 | Turn Indicator gyroscope in a Turn and Slip Indicator (T/S); the output is a vertical needle to the right side, part of the basic six instrument panel; the needle inclines more if the rate of turn is higher, in the direction of the turn, as an effect of the amplitude of the rudder control | 214 |
4.34 | The coordinated turn is balanced, the slip indicator ball is centred; in the skidding turn, the ball and the turn indicator go in opposite directions, the aircraft has a sideslip angle outside the turn; in the slipping turn, the ball and the needle go to the same direction, there is a sideslip angle inside the turn | 215 |
4.35 | In a coordinated turn, the resultant of the weight W and the centrifugal force C is perpendicular on the plane, along the vertical axis of the aircraft (z), so the slip indicator ball stays right in the middle | 216 |
4.36 | Standard Rate-1 Turn as shown on Primary Flight and Navigation Displays (Boeing 737-700) | 221 |
5.1 | A complete rotation of the Earth around its polar axis takes one Sidereal Day (23h 56m 4s); the rest up to 24h is needed for the Earth to rotate a bit extra, to compensate for the movement of the Earth on the orbit around the Sun by 1/365.242199 of the orbit | 229 |
5.2 | Movements types of an orbital celestial body like the Earth, around a central celestial body like the Sun | 231 |
5.3 | Kepler’s Three Laws of planetary movements | 233 |
5.4 | Earth’s orbit around the Sun | 234 |
5.5 | Daylight hours with latitude and season represented as isochrones; night time hours are
24 – daylight hours; equator is not at 12 as expected, there are 13 hours of daylight due to twilight |
235 |
5.6 | The three phases of twilight: civil, nautical, and astronomic make the transition between daylight and night; each phase occupies a range of 6° angular depth below the optical horizon | 238 |
5.7 | Sun’s apparent trajectory in the sky depends on the calendar day, reaching the heighest altitude at the Summer Solstice at noon (in the Northern hemisphere); at equinox, the maximum altitude is equal to the colatitude | 240 |
5.8 | Northern higher latitudes experience the white nights phenomenon in summer: the night never comes because the twilight after sunset merges with the twilight before sunrise; in winter, the same phenomenon affects the Southern latitudes | 246 |
5.9 | The twilight at equator at equinox lasts the least because the angular velocity of the Sun of 15°/hr is perpendicular to the horizon | 247 |
5.10 | The twilight at the poles is the longest, because there is no vertical component of the angular velocity of the Sun apart from that resulted from the revolution movement of the Earth | 248 |
5.11 | Each meridian has its own solar time, as the spin movement exposes each meridian in turn to the Sun rays (arriving from right in this top view) | 257 |
5.12 | The International Date Line (IDL) in red, and its deviations from the 180°E meridian (the dashed green line) | 267 |
6.1 | The phases of a flight in detail, with typical speeds: IAS (blue), Mach (green), and TAS (violet); in a broader view, the airborne flight consists of climb (up to T/C point), cruise (up to T/D point) and descent | 273 |
6.2 | The flight route and profile as defined by the flight plan; the route consists of legs connecting the waypoints, and the flight profile is the projection of the trajectory on a vertical plane | 274 |
6.3 | The four forces and the angles in climb; the aerodynamic path angle g is positive in climb | 275 |
6.4 | The four forces and the angles in level flight; the aerodynamic path angle g is zero during cruise | 275 |
6.5 | The four forces and the angles in descent; the aerodynamic path angle g is negative in descent | 276 |
6.6 | Navigation display wind is given in the format: direction from/velocity; to avoid to/from ambiguities, a small vector is visualised; in this picture, the wind blows from 149° M at 10 knots (Boeing 787, photo credit Capt. Dumitru Oprisiu) | 278 |
6.7 | Vertical navigation wind triangle, vectors and angles | 279 |
6.8 | Horizontal and Vertical Navigation Wind Triangle | 285 |
6.9 | Horizontal Wind Triangle with headwind and crosswind; tailwind is a negative headwind | 286 |
6.10 | Antonov An-2 is a biplane, and the wing surface is almost double than the wing surface of a monoplane; that creates double lift and reduces the stall speed to a value which cannot be determined in flight, due to the insufficient elevator authority (pulling the stick cannot keep the nose up) | 299 |
6.11 | The wind triangle problem in a graphic representation: drift angle DA and the GT=GS/TAS ratio are represented as surfaces depending on two variables: the wind impact angle z and the wind to TAS ratio x = WV/TAS | 301 |
6.12 | Wind triangle problem on opposite tracks with the same wind; the airplane on the left reaches its destination and then returns on the back course (BC); also this applies to the upwind and downwind of an aerodrome circuit | 302 |
6.13 | Classic Inertial Navigation System (INS) with a gyrostabilised platform | 309 |
6.14 | Horizontal navigation deviations: crosstrack XTK, track angle error TKE , course deviation | 310 |
6.15 | Control panel of a classic Inertial Navigation System (INS) with a gyrostabilised platform | 311 |
6.16 | Modern strap down Inertial Reference System (IRS) | 312 |
7.1 | A figther jet (McDonnell Douglas F-15 Eagle) firing a missile (AIM 7 Sparrow); the plane uses the atmosphere to create the lift force; the missile does not need the atmosphere to fly | 319 |
7.2 | Sensors, transducers, data transmission, processing, and storing of the flight parameters, and the machine to man interface: visual (displays), audio, and tactile | 330 |
7.3 | The the first half of the history of avionics records an increasing number of individual displays in the cockpit, in spite of a process of integration of some of the displays into combined displays in the electromechanical integration stage; BAE-Aerospatiale Concorde tops this list with over 200 individual displays; electronics, and then microprocessors allowed massive integration of
information in the second half of this history, ending the story with a stabilization at 6 major displays |
331 |
7.4 | WWI fighter Fokker Dr. 1 Triplane replica with individual gauges (1918) | 332 |
7.5 | Human vision is based on two types of sensors: cones (colour perceptors) and rods (monochrome, more sensitive perceptors in darkness), with an interesting distribution, which is the result of the optimization performed by the genetic algorithms: maximum visual accuity and colour perception stays in a central oval area, where the Basic 6 flight instruments are placed;
peripheral vision is more sensitive in low light and more perceptive to movement, although it does not provide colour information |
332 |
7.6 | In the history of aviation, the navigator was a specialized flight crew member; he had a panel of navigation instruments and a table where aeronautical charts could be unfolded and used to graphically solve navigation problems; the navigator had access to a window; some airplanes offered a great view down from the belly of the cockpit, to visually measure the drift angle when
the visibility allowed (Lockheed L-1049 Constellation – top left, Ilyushin Il-76TD, bottom and right) |
334 |
7.7 | Flight engineer on board of a Boeing 747-300 (TAAG Angola Airlines) | 335 |
7.8 | The evolution of flight crew number and positions in the flight deck of a transport airplane is a direct consequence of flight deck automation, which made redundant most of the positions; in 2020, as the flight is automated (with the exception of the take-off phase), there is debate on the necessity of the remaining two crew members; cargo flight operators would like a crew of one, whereas air taxi operators would like fully automated operations | 335 |
7.9 | Layout of flight instruments and controls in a modern Airbus cockpit (Airbus A330/A340) | 336 |
7.10 | Layout of flight instruments and controls in a modern Boeing cockpit (B787) | 336 |
7.11 | Primary Flight Display (PFD) with Flight Director in split cue variant; the phase of flight is the take-off run; V1, VR, and V2 appear on the Airspeed Tape together with the airspeed trend vector (left); pitch limitation in amber colour indicate the maximum pitch which avoids tailstrike (Boeing 787) [*B8] | 340 |
7.12 | Navigation Display (ND) Vertical Navigation section (Boeing 787); target and actual flight profile
appear together with the final approach path and a section through the terrain [*B8] |
342 |
7.13 | The Inner Loop of the Roll Channel Autopilot; by defaults it levels the wings automatically | 343 |
7.14 | The Inner Loop of the Pitch Channel Autopilot; by defaults it maintains the initial pitch angle | 344 |
7.15 | The Inner Loop of the Yaw Channel Autopilot; by defaults it maintains the initial heading | 345 |
7.16 | Autopilot channel algorithm based on Proportional-Integral-Derivative logic and saturation logic | 346 |
7.17 | Autopilot outer loop functions for non-Fly-By-Wire aircraft (Boeing 747-400, Boeing 737-700) | 348 |
7.18 | Autopilot outer loop functions for Fly-By-Wire aircraft (Boeing 777-200, Airbus A330/A340) | 349 |
7.19 | Turbofan engines key parameters: EPR (TPR for Rolls Royce), N1, and EGT; example of EICAS display of the key parameters is Boeing 787-8; examples of turbofan engines: Rolls Royce AE3007 fitted on the Embraer-145, delivering 40 kN of thrust each (left); General Electric CF34-8C5 deliver 59 kN each for the Canadair Regional Jet CRJ-900 (right) | |
7.20 | Autothrottle functional diagram – adapted from [*OI] | 354 |
7.21 | Flight level (pressure altitude) acquisition A/P outer loop function prevents level busts | 360 |
7.22 | Boeing CWS (Control Wheel Steering – left and above) and TCS (Touch Control Steering – right) | 362 |
7.23 | CAT 3 Fail Passive and Fail Operational Autoland configurations: Boeing 737-700 Fail Passive (above); Boeing 787-8 Fail Operational Triple-Single (inset); Airbus A340 Fail Operational Dual-Dual (below)
|
368 |
7.24 | The Flight Management System (FMS) consists of two or three Flight Management Computer (FMC) units, two or three Control Display Units (CDU); it can calculate on optimised 4D trajectory, then it can provide guidance for the auto-pilot to accurately fly it, while monitoring the fuel quantity remaining | 375 |
7.25 | Ground Proximity Warning System block diagram | 384 |
7.26 | GPWS Mode 1 protects against excessive descent rate (the sudden rise of static pressure) | 384 |
7.27 | GPWS Mode 2 protects against excessive closure of the gap between the aircraft and the terrain | 385 |
7.28 | GPWS Mode 3 protects against loss of altitude after take-off or go around | 385 |
7.29 | GPWS Mode 4 protects against landing without landing gear or flaps or flying too low | 385 |
7.30 | GPWS Mode 5 cautions on flying below the ILS glide slope on final approach | 386 |
7.31 | GPWS Mode 6 issues call outs during final approach and landing | 386 |
7.32 | GPWS Mode 7 protects against the windshear threat | 387 |
7.33 | The principle of the Traffic Collision Avoidance System (TCAS) is based on the Tau variable, which is the time left until the own aircraft and the target will be at the closest distance of each other, potentially colliding; 40 seconds before, a Traffic Advisory is issued (caution level – amber), and 25 seconds before, a Resolution Advisory (warning level – red); the trigger threshold is a function of range and range rate | 391 |
7.34 | The block and logic diagram of the Traffic Collision Avoidance System (TCAS) adapted after [*RT] | 394 |
7.35 | The TCAS logic sense and strength: the normal case, level crossing exception, and sense reversal | 397 |
7.36 | TCAS display symbols and meaning | 398 |
8.1 | Line of sight propagation is similar to visible light propagation; the range of a radio system is limited by the curvature of the Earth and also can be masked by mountains, hills, buidings etc. | 412 |
8.2 | Sky wave propagation: multiple refections between ionosphere and ground (sea water) occurs due to the particular feature of HF to be reflected by the ionosphere | 413 |
8.3 | Ground wave propagation: the radio waves follow the curvature of the Earth and the undulations of the surface (mountains, hills) | 414 |
8.4 | Radio systems features depend on frequency: antenna size, efficiency, energy consumption, cost and complexity, and range | 416 |
8.5 | Atmospheric attenuation of UHF+ radio waves due to absorption by Oxygen and by Water as a function of frequency – adapted from [*IT] | 421 |
8.6 | Radio telephony transmitter (above) and receiver (below) using amplitude modulation; insets show the wave forms; carrier is represented in black and the voice signal is in blue | 430 |
8.7 | Amplitude modulation variants (A is the normal variant and J is used for long distance radio telephony in HF via sky wave) | 432 |
8.8 | Example of frequency modulation of a triangular signal as used in the radar altimeter | 433 |
8.9 | The simple modulation types for pulses | 433 |
8.10 | Non directional (NDB) and omni directional beacons (VOR) allow goniometry, but in two distinct variants: gisments G and relevments R, respectively; radio telemetry (DME) provides the straight line distance
between the ground station and the aircraft rDME |
437 |
8.11 | Radio telemetry determines a distance (range) r1 between the locator (aircraft) and a target with known position x1, y1, z1; radio differential telemetry determines a difference of ranges r1 – r2 between two targets with known position and the locator | 439 |
8.12 | Automatic Direction Finder rectangular antenna is kept with the direction of nil reception twards the NDB in a closed automation loop, with the gisment being displayed on the GI | 444 |
8.13 | Automatic Direction Finder block diagram, with a phase shifter which rotates the cardiod by 90° 60 times per second, to sense which way to turn in case the direction of nil reception of the cardiod becomes misaligned due to the movement of the aircraft, to achieve nil reception back on the shortest way
|
445 |
8.14 | Positioning using two ground direction finder stations is similar to Theta-Theta navigation, two QTEs are requested and the position is found at the intersection of the two lines of position; Class C services (+10°) however have a substantial methodical error (Geometric Dilution of Precision, in yellow) | 450 |
8.15 | Radio markers (MKR) cover the uncertainty cone of any radio navigation aid used for goniometry by a directional transmission upwards, at the vertical, on a unique standard frequency; the vertical directivity of the NDB antenna is shaped like a doughnut, not covering the vertical | 451 |
8.16 | The radiodrome is the locus of points of zero gisment in flying into a non-directional beacon; it takes a spiral shape from integration of the wind triangle and is a direct consequence of the drift angle | 453 |
8.17 | VOR principle is to rotate a cardioid directivity antenna; an observer would receive a cycloid signal v (magenta); every time the cycloid passes through zero, another signal, an amplitude modulated cycloid r (cyan) also passes through zero, as a phase reference; thus, the phase of v gives the relevment | 454 |
8.18 | VOR locator block diagram shares the radio section with the ILS | 455 |
8.19 | Electrical rotation of the Alford loop antenna system is simulated with four perpendicular antennas which are energised by a cosine – sine law (above); VOR Brasov, Romania (BRV) in the Postavaru Mt. (left); VOR ground antenna seen from above with 50+1 Alford loop antennas over a counterpoise (right) | 456 |
8.20 | VOR inbound flight is made on a TO radial, so the indications of the Course Deviation Indicator (CDI) are consistent with the needle representing the desired trajectory and the centre dot the actual trajectory of the aircraft; VOR outbound flight requires a FROM radial; the two radials are opposite | 459 |
8.21 | Volume of service of three categories of VOR navigation aids: TVOR, low altitude VOR, and high altitude (enroute) VOR; the cone of silence is represented to scale, with a base radius of 11.8 NM at 60,000 ft | 461 |
8.22 | TVOR installed in the runway axis at the Geneva International Airport LSGG | 463 |
8.23 | The principle of the Distance Measuring Equipment (DME) system; the ground DME transponder automatically replies to all interrogations after a fixed delay, and based on that, the direct (slant) distance may be determined by the on board locator; times in ms correspond to the X channels, Y channels are different | 465 |
8.24 | Automated selection of frequency is transparent to the pilot, who only tunes in the main navigation aid the DME is associated with on NAV radio control panel | 467 |
8.25 | Generating a pair of DME pulses is a typical application of digital sequential circuits design, involving a digital clock, a Modulo-48 counter, a 6:64 decoder and some gates | 468 |
8.26 | Perturbation (spikes) are detected as variations of both pulse width and delay (left); collisions or jitter respect one but not both (right); a very close collision (under 0.15 NM) respects only the pulse delay | 469 |
8.27 | If the own pairs are in a random succession, this is the key to identify the own replies in the crowded sequence of replies to everybody; the own interrogation sequence is memorized and than shifted in time (delayed) until a positive match of times is found; the delay coresponds to the Dt | 470 |
8.28 | Random time generator using an integrator to trigger a monostable circuit | 471 |
8.29 | The DME block diagram including the random pulse clock, the pulse pair generator, the pair validity filter, the automatic gain control amplifier, the superheterodyne on 63 MHz, the search of own replies logic and the calculation and display of the rDME | 472 |
8.30 | To be used in horizontal navigation, the distance measured by the DME must be corrected | 474 |
8.31 | Radar altimeter transmitted wave Tx and the received echo Rx using frequency modulation of a triangular signal | 478 |
8.32 | Radar altimeter block diagram – first variant with large bandwidth IF amplifier | 480 |
8.33 | Radar altimeter block diagram – low bandwidth IF variant | 481 |
8.34 | Radar altimeter typical components | 483 |
8.35 | Primary Flight Display and the radar altimeter height window in the brown area of the artificial horizon indicating –4 ft above ground (B777-200H/ER Emirates, Photo Craig Murray) | 484 |
8.36 | Radar altimeter measurement at touchdown vs. front wheel touchdown (taxi posture) | 485 |
8.37 | RNAV airways do not require physical radio navigation aids along the route, just navigation fixes, which are database entries | 491 |
8.38 | RNAV airborne technology uses microprocessors to emulate by software a virtual VOR/DME wherever is needed, given a dense enough coverage of existent (real) VOR/DMEs | 492 |
8.39 | Original on board standalone RNAV equipment with its own control panels; there was no separate display, the RNAV calculated navigation information was displayed on CDI, RMI, or HSI (as above) | 493 |
8.40 | Rho-Theta navigation with wind triangle | 496 |
8.41 | Rho-Theta Geometric Dilution of Precision (GDOP); the position is found inside the area at the intersection of a triangle with a circular crown, with a given probability | 497 |
8.42 | Theta-Theta navigation | 498 |
8.43 | Theta-Theta Geometric Dilution of Precision | 499 |
8.44 | Rho-Rho navigation | 500 |
8.45 | Rho-Rho Geometric Dilution of Precision: a poor case, when the circles are almost tangent | 502 |
8.46 | Hyperbola is the locus of points where the difference in the time of arrival (the delay) of two signals from the two focal points is constant | 511 |
8.47 | LORAN receiver measures the delays of the slave signals 1 and 2; the position is found at the intersection of the two hyperbolas | 512 |
8.48 | LORAN pulse characteristics allow the extraction of the time reference based on the amplitude of the envelope in time, whereas the bandwidth demand is less than the one for a rectangular pulse | 513 |
8.49 | Instrument Landing System (ILS) consisting of Localizer (LLZ), Glide Path (GP), and three markers: Outer Marker (OM), Middle Marker (MM), and an optional Inner Marker (IM) | 516 |
8.50 | Decision Height (DH) and Runway Visual Range (RVR) are simultaneous constraints to meet in order to continue to land in a precision instrument approach based on instruments | 518 |
8.51 | Optimal Glide Slope angle is a trade-off between various conflicting goals factors | 520 |
8.52 | A precision approach procedure consists of a turn to intercept the runway extension line and a constant glide slope starting at FAP and ending above the runway, in the touchdown zone | 521 |
8.53 | Runway lights (left) or markings (right) are the visual clues that the pilots have to see at the decision height (DH) in order to continue to land; in absence of the visual contact, the approach is going missed and the aircraft performs a go-around | 521 |
8.54 | Kinematic diagram of the flare manoeuvre, including the decrab; this manouvre is performed at the end of the final approach segment, prior to touchdown, with the objective of a positive touchdown with a rate of descent limited to –120 fpm | 522 |
8.55 | The ILS-LLZ uses an equsignal principle to determine the position of the aircraft with respect to the runway axis; when the left and the right lobe signals are equally received, the aircraft is right in the middle of the two signals, on the bisector; the photo shows the ILS-LLZ antenna arrays | 523 |
8.56 | The ILS-GP uses the same equsignal principle to determine the position of the aircraft with respect to a plane descending to the landing position at the published glide slope angle between 2.5° and 4°; when the upper and the lower lobe signals are equally received, the aircraft is right on the bisector of the two slightly divergent lobes; the photos show the ILS-GP antenna arrays | 524 |
8.57 | Maintaining a correct stabilized precision approach requires centred needles on the cross hair indicator | 525 |
8.58 | ILS-GP was intended to be used using a level intermediary approach trajectory, thus avoiding the false paths which a generated by the multiple ground reflections | 525 |
8.59 | Three block diagrams corresponding to the ILS subsystems: ILS-LLZ (loclalizer) block diagram, sharing the radio section and the CDI display with the VOR; in the middle ILS-GP (glide path), tuning automatically on the channel associated to the ILS-LLZ frequency; below the ILS-MKR (marker) | 527 |
8.60 | Placement, directivity and identification signals of ILS markers | 528 |
8.61 | ILS perturbation factors | 529 |
… | ||
8.63 | A satellite on a circumterrestial orbit of radius R+H is launched vertically then pushed tagentially until it reaches the speed V, for which the centrifugal force C balances the centripetal force W; the satellite continues to orbit indefinitely with no further supply of energy, since the orbit is outside the Earth atmosphere and thus there is no friction to slow it down | |
8.64 | Navstar orbit with four unequally spaced satellites, inclined at 55° from Equator | |
8.65 | All 6 Navstar orbits shifted at 30° increments for a uniform worldwide distribution of the satellites; side view (left) and topdown view (right); apparent size of the satellites suggests viewer distance | |
9.1 | The loxodrome (in green) is the simplest long range navigation route, a „straight” line intersecting all meridians under the same angle (TClox or TKlox); in the inset there is a local infinitely small sample of the trajectory, which is a direct to line, as to this scale, parallels and meridians can be considered straight lines | |
9.2 | The orthodrome (in red) alongside the loxodrome (in green); from the pilot’s perspective, the orthodrome is a giant turn; in the picture, the pilot starts at departure (D) due North-East, and ends up at A, on a South-Eastrly course | |
9.3 | The orthodrome spherical triangle DNA where usually we know a and d as complementary to LATD and LATA respectively; also we know n as the difference between the two longitudes; the orthodrome distance DISORT results from the side n of the triangle, and the terminal tracks from d and a | |
9.4 | A double rotation brings the North Pole onto the Departure Point D; in the rotated frame, all meridians are orthodromes departing from D in all directions | |
9.5 | Crosswind is neutralized by the friction between wheels and ground surface when the aircraft is on ground; when airborne, it is carried by the wind, and its ground speed is deflected from the longitudinal axis by the drift angle (DA); there is a sudden change of track (TRK) at lift-off | |
9.6 | Drift Angle (DA) is visible in these pictures; the crosswind causes the slant attitudes of these aircraft on short final; their tracks (courses) are along the runway axes; prior to touchdown, all these airliners will need to decrab using the rudder, so as the wheels run along the runway axis | |
9.7 | Examples of fast aloft winds (Courtesy of Capt. A310/A318 Emil Dobrovolschi of Tarom): 186 kts (left), 149 kts (above), 132 kts (right), when the Ground Speed ranges from 286 kts to 621 kts | |
9.8 | Crossing a river on the shortest distance (above) and in shortest time (below) | |
9.9 | Thought experiment which illustrates the superiority of the brachistochrone over the orthodrome as air navigation trajectory (ETE is Estimated Time Enroute, the travel time) | |
… | ||
12.1 | The Cost Index (CI) setting in the Flight Management Computer is the trade-off parameter between economy (fuel savings and subsequently range) and performance (speed) |
List of Tables
Table | Legend | Page |
2.1 | Rotation ellipsoids in geodesy | 39 |
2.2 | Acceleration of gravity correction for each meter of elevation above the ellipsoid | 48 |
2.3 | Polynomial correction coefficients | 49 |
3.1 | ISA Temperature functions (see Figure 3.3) | 77 |
3.2 | ISA Pressure functions (see Figure 3.3) | 80 |
3.3 | ISA Density functions (see Figure 3.3) | 81 |
3.4 | Basic six flight instruments | 108 |
3.5 | Synthesis of Baro Instruments | 123 |
3.6 | Baro Instruments Behaviour in case of Blockage and Leaks | 129 |
4.1 | Hard and soft iron | 179 |
4.2 | Standard turns | 217 |
5.1 | Wavelengths and Frequencies of Visible Light | 236 |
5.2 | Refraction of Light in the Atmosphere | 236 |
5.3 | International Date Line Crossing | 266 |
5.4 | Extreme Time Zone Places | 267 |
6.1 | Wind triangle particular cases | 297 |
7.1 | Buoyancy factor by different gases | 322 |
7.2 | ICAO Type Identifier for BAC One-Eleven | 324 |
7.3 | Special aircraft designators | 325 |
7.4 | Flight Fundamental Actions (the highest priority first) | 326 |
7.5 | Potential Reasons to Reject a Take-Off | 328 |
7.6 | How many lines of code? | 329 |
7.7 | Primary Flight Display information | 338 |
7.8 | Navigation Display information (Map Mode) | 341 |
7.9 | Airplane Automated Flight Control Systems (Autopilots) | 343 |
7.10 | A structured hierarchy of automation layers in aviation | 347 |
7.11 | Autoland Status | 367 |
7.12 | FBW Control Laws – Airbus and Boeing | 369 |
7.13 | Typical FMS software functions [Bu1] | 377 |
7.14 | Flight Warning System announcements (priority from highest to lowest) | 379 |
7.15 | Genuine / Nuisance / False Alerts | 381 |
7.16 | TCAS II V7.1 Alerts and Aural Annunciations | 397 |
8.1 | Speed of Electromangnetic Waves | 401 |
8.2 | Electromagnetic Spectrum | 402 |
8.3 | Radio Communications Disciplines | 406 |
8.4 | Radiolocation Disciplines and Examples | 407 |
8.5 | Pluses and Minuses of Passive Radiolocation | 408 |
8.6 | Pluses and Minuses of Primary Radiolocation | 409 |
8.7 | Pluses and Minuses of Secondary Radiolocation | 410 |
8.8 | Radio Bands – Carrier Frequency Do | 411 |
8.9 | Letter Based Nomenclature of the UHF+ Radio Bands | 411 |
8.10 | Bandwidth of typical radio transmissions | 419 |
8.11 | Atmospheric Noise Affecting Different Radio Bands (night time) | 420 |
8.12 | Classification of Emissions | 428 |
8.13 | Modulations Used in Aviation | 429 |
8.14 | Radio positioning methods (surveillance included) | 438 |
8.15 | Radio Navigation Systems Performance Parameters | 440 |
8.16 | Complex VOR Signal Components (see also Figure 8.18) | 457 |
8.17 | The allocation of DME channels to associated frequencies | 466 |
8.18 | DME channels frequencies and associated frequencies | 467 |
8.19 | Positioning Radio Navigation Systems | 509 |
8.20 | ILS channels and frequencies | 528 |
… | ||
8.21 | Orbital parameters of the GNSS systems satellites | |
… | ||
9.1 | Classification of brachistochrones | |
12.1 | Kalman filter algorithm |
List of Numerical Close-ups
NCU | Problem | Page |
2.1 | GSC to ECEF Conversion and Back | 35 |
2.2 | Loosing Weight in Flight | 51 |
2.3 | Weight on the ISS | 52 |
2.4 | Aircraft weight and lift | 52 |
2.5 | Geoid and WGS84 Ellipsoid calculations | 57 |
3.1 | Extreme variations of isobaric surfaces due to weather pressure | 65 |
3.2 | Extreme variations of isobaric surfaces due to temperature | 70 |
3.3 | Standard Temperature Variation with Height or Elevation | 78 |
3.4 | Converting barometric vertical distances into geometric | 88 |
3.5 | Humidity impact on air density | 98 |
3.6 | Density altitude | 100 |
3.7 | Air speed calculations | 118 |
4.1 | The Dark Side of the Moon | 161 |
4.2 | ADS/B reception range | 163 |
4.3 | Coverage of an Aireon satellite | 165 |
4.4 | Magnetic compass variance | 173 |
4.5 | Magnetic compass swinging | 182 |
4.6 | Euler angles and quaternions | 196 |
4.7 | In flight gyroscope apparent drift | 204 |
4.8 | Turn dynamics | 217 |
4.9 | Holding pattern | 222 |
5.1 | Daylight and Twilight in VFR flight | 251 |
5.2 | Flight Time | 268 |
5.3 | New Year Double Party with Concorde | 271 |
6.1 | Soaring glider | 281 |
6.2 | Top of climb | 282 |
6.3 | Mt St Odile | 289 |
6.4 | Wind Triangle | 292 |
6.5 | Holding Pattern with Wind | 304 |
6.6 | Inertial navigation | 314 |
8.1 | Negative Radar Height | 487 |
8.2 | Rho-Theta, Theta-Theta, and Rho-Rho Navigation | 503 |
9.1 | Fly direct to | |
9.2 | Loxodrome | |
9.3 | Orthodrome trajectory | |
9.4 | Orthodrome distance using rotations | |
9.5 | Orthodrome vs. Loxodrome | |
9.6 | 2D Brachistochrone | |
9.7 | 3D Brachistochrone | |
12.1 | Aircraft positioning optimisation using Kalman algorithm |
Standarde 101
Standarde 101 Ce este? Acest webinar integral în limba engleză se adresează studenților Facultății de Inginerie Aerospațială care sunt interesați de a-și mări șansele de carieră prin înțelegerea standardizării, sau să-și îmbunătățească traiectoria profesională prin...
Conferința EASN Salonic 8-11 oct 2024
A 14-a Conferință European Aeronautical Sciences Network se va desfășura la Salonic, Grecia, între 8-11 octombrie 2024. Conferința anuală EASN a devenit cel mai imprtant eveniment de acest tip în domeniul aerospațial din Europa, lucrările prezentate având mai multe...
Malaysian 370 – După 10 ani
Late Edit: Am introdus o secțiune a acestui site pe acest subiect <MH 370>. Vă interesează cazul MH370? Care sunt scenariile MH370 și care sunt probabilitățile lor? Ce putem face pentru evitarea pe viitor a unor cazuri similare? Ce lecții poate învăța...
Primul AIP Digital al României
Primul AIP Digital al României de Octavian Thor Pleter De curând am găsit și am scanat niște documente vechi, din 1991-1992, care mi-au adus aminte de primele reușite profesionale. Când am absolvit Facultatea de Aeronave în 1986, îmi descoperisem talentul pentru...
Noul Master de Aviație al Universității Sapienza din Roma
Un nou program de master în inginerie aerospațială de nivelul 2 va fi lansat la Universitatea Sapienza din Roma, cu predare integrală în limba engleză. Pe 11 decembrie 2023 va avea loc la Roma o sesiune de prezentare accesibilă și pe Zoom. Cursurile vor începe din...
NASA Space Apps Challenge România
S-au deschis înscrierile pentru NASA Space Apps Challenge România, cel mai mare hackathon internațional! Ești pasionat de spațiu, știință și vrei să schimbi lumea? Te invităm să te înscrii la NASA Space Apps Challenge România, cel mai mare hackathon internațional. 📍...
Oportunitate profesională pentru inginerii aerospațiali
𝗢𝗽𝗼𝗿𝘁𝘂𝗻𝗶𝘁𝗮𝘁𝗲! Daca sunteti absolventi de aeronautica si doriti sa lucrati intr-un mediu international, 𝗔𝗸𝗸𝗼𝗱𝗶𝘀 𝗙𝗿𝗮𝗻𝘁𝗮 are cateva propuneri pentru voi! Angajam juniori si experti dornici sa lucreze pentru marile companii aero. Pozitiile disponibile sunt in Toulouse, pe...
Concurs internațional UAV
Un prim concurs internațional major de UAV-uri se va desfășura la Universitatea Politehnica din București în acest an. Se pot înscrie echipe de studenți din toate universitățile care compun alianța EELISA. Calendarul concursului și alte informații se pot obține de la...
Conferința EASN Salerno 5-8 sep 2023
A 13-a Conferință European Aeronautical Sciences Network se va desfășura la Salerno, Italia, între 5-8 septembrie 2023. Conferința anuală EASN a devenit cel mai imprtant eveniment de acest tip în domeniul aerospațial din Europa, lucrările prezentate având mai multe...
Concursuri AIAS
AUTORITATEA DE INVESTIGAȚII ȘI ANALIZĂ PENTRU SIGURANȚA AVIAȚIEI CIVILE (AIAS) scoate la concurs posturi de interes pentru membrii noștri. Mai multe detalii pe site-ul autorității:...
0 Comentarii